DOES GREEN ACCOUNTING MATTER TO THE PROFITABILITY OF FIRMS? A CANONICAL ASSESSMENT

Amaechi Patrick Egbunike and Godsday Edesiri Okoro

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

Quite a few studies have argued that green accounting does matter to the profitability of a firm; however, little is known about Nigerian firms. To address this gap, this paper seeks to investigate whether green accounting matters to the profitability of Nigerian firms or not. Towards achieving this, an expo-facto research design was adopted and ten non-consumer goods firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange were selected during 2012-2016. The data were sourced from the annual reports and accounts of the selected non-consumer goods firms. The data comprised of green accounting (expenses of community involvement and the amount spent on environmental protection) and profitability (return on equity and Tobin Q) indicators. The data obtained were analyzed by using canonical correlations. The study revealed that there was no significant relationship between green accounting and profitability measures among the non-consumer goods firms. The implication is that whether or not firms engage in green accounting, their profitability level remains unchanged. In addition, this provides evidence that the practice of green accounting among non-consumer goods firms in Nigeria is still at its ad-hoc stage. On the basis of the above findings, we proposed that the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and corporate entities should, as a matter of fact, accommodate the growing awareness in green accounting and formulate a disclosure requirement aimed at improving the profitability of firms. This will no doubt enhance green accounting practices among firms and in general policies aimed at enhancing their competitiveness in the industry in which they are domiciled. 

Keywords: green accounting, return on equity, expenses on environmental protection and employee safety, canonical correlation

JEL Classification: M41, M48

Ekonomski horizonti2018, 20(1), 17-26. Elektronska verzija objavljena 26. aprila 2018
doi:10.5937/ekonhor1801017E